If a centre-back is the closest
defender to a striker making a run into the box, his primary objective must be
to get goal-side and block the passing lane or limit the shooting angle. In
one-versus-one situations, attackers generally possess superior footwork, ball
control, and decision-making skills. Any delay by the defender often results in
the attacker either beating him with a dribble or improving the shooting angle
without needing to dribble at all. The only exception to this is when the
striker is on his weaker foot and the shooting angle is already narrow — in
that case, stepping in front might not be necessary.
For example, in the scenario
analysed here, it is quite clear even before the pass is made that thestriker
will be the target, as there are no other players actively attacking the
penalty area. The striker receives the ball just outside the box, but the
defender attempting to close him down is already too late and out of position.
The striker not only has time and space but also a favourable angle to shoot.
In such cases, the centre-back must read the play earlier and position himself
accordingly — not just to intercept, but to reduce the direct threat to goal
before it fully develops.
In the
continuation of the play, the centre-back makes a second critical mistake: due
to poor positioning, he ends up behind the attacker and attempts to recover by
stretching for the ball from behind. At first glance, this may appear to be a
desperate attempt to recover, but such a challenge carries significant risk.
Even the slightest contact that disrupts the attacker’s balance can result in a
penalty and a straight red card. This type of intervention is generally more
damaging than beneficial for the defending team. Of course, there are
exceptional scenarios — such as in the final minutes of a match when conceding
a goal must be avoided at all costs, or if the attacker has pushed the ball too
far ahead — where taking this risk might be justified. However, as a general
rule, centre-backs must remain composed and anticipate earlier, adopting a
defensive approach that prevents the need for last-ditch tackles in the first
place.
So,
what could the defender have done instead? Knowing that the striker is
left-footed, it would be significantly harder for him to take an accurate shot
if he shifts the ball to his right side after receiving it. Therefore, if the
centre-back had positioned himself slightly more to the left, he would have
effectively narrowed the shooting angle for the striker’s stronger foot. In
doing so, he would also have forced the attacker into a dribbling action due to
the close proximity. If the striker then chose to cut the ball back onto his
left foot, the slight delay created would have allowed the recovering centre-back
or a supporting teammate to step in and win the ball. In such situations, the
defender's objective should not always be to immediately win the ball, but
rather to manipulate the attacker into making a less effective decision under
pressure.
Comments
Post a Comment